| Pages: [1] |
1. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Tinu Moorhsum wrote: Fighters for a level 4 mission? LOL I've never met a level 4 mission that couldn't be cleared with a Drake (or rapidly in a pair of Drakes). Not sure I would like wag my carrier's buttocks in the proverbial wind to clear...
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.11 13:10:00
|
2. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
If a mission is used it can't be cleared unless you 'complete' it via the agent.
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.11 11:39:00
|
3. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Fighters will not follow you into DED space. Depends on how you enter it ^_^
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.11 05:38:00
|
4. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Level IV Security wrote: I failed to see where I said it will be invulnerable forever, please point me to that place so I can fix it. I have a pretty good idea of the constraints on the method, but this tactic allows the ...
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.10 19:17:00
|
5. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I failed to see where I said it will be invulnerable forever, please point me to that place so I can fix it. I have a pretty good idea of the constraints on the method, but this tactic allows the carrier a certain comfort zone to operate from, wh...
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.10 19:11:00
|
6. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Well, for instance, the radius of the DEDSpace sphere could be increased by a considerable factor. This would turn it from a mere nuisance of 20-30 minutes to a matter of hours, which, i hope you'll agree - would at least bring the effort of the s...
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.10 18:52:00
|
7. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
It'll be as safe as I'll want it to be vOv , since I'll have all the initiative.
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.10 18:44:00
|
8. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: Since this isn't regarded as a bug or exploit, this thread has been re-opened. Thank you for your chivalrous save of the day. May I ask, If we're at it - Why isn't a application of a ships DPS with the ship being practi...
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.10 18:33:00
|
9. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
What makes you think I didn't? If you read carefully, I didn't ask whether it's an exploit or not, it may hint that I have official confirmation that it's not. That's precisely why I asked my question.
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.10 10:13:00
|
10. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I'd like the CCP game designers view on why isn't it a case of a clear exploit. I hope it's not too much to ask for.
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.10 09:11:00
|
11. What do you think about the following evasion 'tactics' - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
( A repost from FHC ) So... Say you have a carrier or two, and you really enjoy the DPS offered by fighters but you REALLY don't want to place the carrier on the field to be stomped on by some cheeky unexpected foe. What shall you do, what shall...
- by Level IV Security - at 2014.09.10 07:11:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |